Strategic vs. Private Equity Buyers: Who Is the Right Partner for Your Pharma Services Company?

Share This Post

Companies across the clinical research ecosystem, including CROs, clinical research sites and site networks, site management organizations (SMOs), and patient recruitment and enrollment providers, continue to attract significant interest from both strategic acquirers and private equity investors. As clinical trial volume grows and the need for efficient patient access intensifies, well operated research organizations have become increasingly valuable to buyers seeking scale, capability expansion, and reliable study execution.

For founders, physician owners, and leadership teams preparing for a sale or recapitalization, one of the most important decisions is selecting the right type of buyer. Strategic acquirers and private equity firms both play important roles in the market, but they bring different motivations, structures, and long term implications for the business.

This article explores how each buyer type approaches the clinical research ecosystem, incorporates buyer activity data from 2021 through the first half of 2025, and demonstrates how the right buyer can influence valuation and long term outcomes.

 

Key Insights at a Glance 

  • Strategic and private equity buyers remain highly active in the clinical research ecosystem, although their approaches, objectives, and operating models differ in important ways.
  • Strategic acquirers represent the majority of transaction activity in a pharma services sample dataset covering 2021 through H1 2025, accounting for approximately 90 percent of analyzed deals.
  • Private equity has established a consistent presence in CROs, clinical research site networks, SMOs, and patient recruitment companies, typically representing 10 to 16 percent of transaction activity.
  • Strategic buyers often bring infrastructure, technology, commercial reach, and operational integration that can accelerate growth. Private equity typically offers liquidity combined with continued leadership involvement, a large portfolio of resources, and capital for expansion.
  • The right partner depends on the owner’s priorities, which may include full exit, operational scale, capital for growth, long term equity value, or leadership continuity.

 

Buyer Activity Across Pharma Services (2021 to H1 2025) 

This analysis draws on a representative dataset of transactions sourced from PitchBook and Capital IQ. The data reflects completed deals between 2021 and the first half of 2025 and spans five subsectors within the broader pharma services landscape. These subsectors include Drug Development Services, CRO, CDMO, Pharma Commercialization, and Data Analytics.

Strategic Buyers Lead by Volume 

Across the full five sector dataset, strategic acquirers account for approximately 90 percent of completed transactions. Financial and private equity buyers represent the remaining 10 percent. This distribution reflects an ongoing interest in scale, integration opportunities, patient access, and therapeutic expertise, all of which are central to strategic consolidation strategies.

Private Equity Participation Across Subsectors

Private equity involvement varies across the broader dataset. The table below summarizes private equity participation by subsector. 

 

Subsector 

Financial (PE) 

Strategic 

Total 

Percent Financial 

Percent Strategic 

CDMO 

11 

44 

55 

20.0%

80.0% 

CRO 

17 

116 

133 

12.8%

87.2% 

Data Analytics 

10 

94 

104 

9.6%

90.4% 

Drug Development Services 

17 

233 

250 

6.8% 

93.2% 

Pharma Commercialization 

1 

14 

15 

6.7% 

93.3% 

 

Relevance for CROs, Clinical Research Sites, SMOs, and Enrollment Providers

Private equity participation in CROs and data analytics closely mirrors what is happening in the clinical research ecosystem. PE backed platforms continue to pursue add on acquisitions to strengthen patient access, expand geographic reach, and broaden therapeutic expertise. Higher private equity participation in CDMO also reflects investor interest in scalable infrastructure and operational efficiency, themes that similarly influence investments in national SMO platforms and multi site patient access networks.

Taken together, the buyer mix in the broader dataset captures the same forces shaping transactions involving CROs, clinical research sites, SMOs, and patient recruitment organizations. Strategic buyers continue to lead transaction volume, yet private equity has become an important driver of consolidation in areas tied to study execution, enrollment performance, and patient availability.

 

Strategic Buyers: When Integration and Scale Matter Most 

Strategic acquirers often include regional, national, or global CROs, integrated site networks, large patient enrollment platforms, and technology enabled clinical operations companies. These buyers are typically motivated by the opportunity to expand their capabilities, strengthen sponsor relationships, and integrate complementary operations into their existing platforms.

Strategic buyers frequently bring well developed business development engines, advanced regulatory infrastructure, and established technology systems. For organizations seeking broader reach, operational support, and the advantages of integration, strategic buyers can unlock growth that would be difficult to achieve independently. In many cases, strategic acquisition also provides a clearer path for a complete transition for founders who wish to exit the business.

 

Private Equity Buyers: When Capital, Flexibility, and Continued Leadership Are Priorities 

Private equity buyers are often the preferred choice for founders who want liquidity while continuing to guide the business. PE firms typically invest with the intention of scaling an organization, whether through organic growth, geographic expansion, or targeted acquisitions. For CROs, site networks, SMOs, and enrollment providers, private equity involvement often includes investments in technology, leadership recruitment, operational processes, and standardized performance management systems.

Private equity also offers flexibility in structuring transactions for multi owner or physician led organizations, where liquidity needs and timelines may differ among partners. The ability to retain meaningful equity for a future sale is often a compelling advantage for founders who believe in the long term potential of their business and want to participate in future value creation.

Which Buyer Is Right for You

Deciding between a strategic acquirer and a private equity partner depends on the specific goals of the owners and the long term trajectory of the business. Companies that want to grow quickly through expanded infrastructure, additional therapeutic areas, or access to national sponsor relationships may find that a strategic buyer offers the most direct path to scale. Owners who prefer a full exit often find strategic transactions to be more straightforward, particularly when the acquiring company has an established integration model.

Private equity may be a better fit for founders who want liquidity while continuing to lead the organization. PE investment often supports expansion plans that require capital, such as opening new sites, enhancing patient recruitment operations, upgrading systems, or pursuing acquisitions. Private equity is also well suited for groups of owners with different liquidity needs, since PE firms can structure terms and payouts to align with each owner’s goals. For many organizations, private equity represents a balance of financial liquidity, operational support, and continued independence.

 

 

FAQ: Strategic vs. Private Equity for CROs, Research Sites, SMOs, and Enrollment Providers 

1. Do strategic buyers typically pay more?

Strategic buyers may pay higher valuations when strong synergies exist. Private equity can match or exceed those valuations for businesses with strong growth potential or platform value.

2. Which buyer type tends to move faster?

Private equity firms often move more quickly, especially for add on acquisitions. Strategic buyers frequently have longer diligence cycles due to integration planning.

3. Which subsectors attract the most private equity interest?

Site networks, SMOs, patient recruitment and enrollment services, mid sized CROs, and technology enabled clinical operations companies.

4. What if I want to stay involved after the sale?

Private equity is typically the better option for founders who want to continue leading the business.

5. What if I am planning a full exit?

Strategic buyers often provide a clearer pathway for a complete transition.

6. How do multi owner or physician owner groups choose between buyer types?

Private equity offers more flexibility for structuring payouts and rollovers, which can help align different owner interests.

7. How do valuation drivers differ?

Strategic buyers focus on synergy potential and capability expansion. Private equity values scalability, profitability, and platform creation. The best outcome depends on the specific strengths and long term prospects of the business.

 

Conclusion

Strategic acquirers and private equity investors offer different strengths, and the best choice depends on the goals of the owner(s) and the future direction of the business. Strategic buyers can provide scale, integrated systems, and established sponsor relationships that accelerate growth. Private equity firms offer flexibility, capital for expansion, and the opportunity for founders to continue leading the organization while participating in future value creation.

The data from 2021 through H1 2025 indicates that strategic buyers remain the dominant force in pharma services M&A, yet private equity has become an influential and steadily growing participant, particularly in areas connected to patient access, data driven operations, and clinical execution. Owners who understand these dynamics and prepare effectively are best positioned to create competitive tension, maximize value, and secure a partner that aligns with their long term vision.

Our Life Sciences Services & Tech Practice regularly helps business owners clarify their goals, prepare for a sale, and run competitive processes that attract both strategic and private equity buyers in an effort to help our clients to make confident decisions, maximize value, and meet their unique goals. Contact us today to learn more.

 

About The Author

Channing Hamlet - Objective-Team-Headshots-blackandwhite

Channing Hamlet

Co-Founder and Managing Director

Life Sciences & Business Services Practice Leader

+ Listen In: Channing ft. on Deep Wealth Podcast

+ 2025 Banking & Finance Visionary – LA Times

Channing Hamlet has over 25 years of experience in investment banking and business valuation, advising middle market companies on transactions and strategic initiatives. Before joining Objective, he was a Managing Director at Cabrillo Advisors, where he led M&A execution and built a national valuation practice. He previously held roles at Vistage, LLR Partners, and Legg Mason. Mr. Hamlet holds a Master’s Degree in Operations Research and a Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering from Cornell University.

 

Disclosure

This news release is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an offer, invitation or recommendation to buy, sell, subscribe for or issue any securities. While the information provided herein is believed to be accurate and reliable, Objective Capital Partners and BA Securities, LLC make no representations or warranties, expressed or implied, as to the accuracy or completeness of such information. All information contained herein is preliminary, limited and subject to completion, correction or amendment. It should not be construed as investment, legal, or tax advice and may not be reproduced or distributed to any person.  Securities and investment banking services are offered through BA Securities, LLC Member FINRA, SIPC. Principals of Objective Capital are Registered Representatives of BA Securities. Objective Capital Partners and BA Securities are separate and unaffiliated entities.